NOTES ON ENEMY AIRCRAFT
The information contained in this summary should be transferred immediately to Informational Intelligence Summary No. 43-26, “Japanese Aircraft and Armament,” revised September 1943.
JAPAN
New Japanese Type 2 Single-Engine Fighter, TOJO
TOJO 1. Informational Intelligence Summaries No. 43-49 of 10 November and No. 43-51 of 30 November contained certain previously known details of the Type 2 single-engine fighter TOJO. A recent report has been received that includes sketches and drawings of this aircraft, these being reproduced in Fig. 6. Data supplementary to that given in the Summaries mentioned above follows:
a. Wing is constructed in six sections. It is joined by bolted-type joints at the centerline, and at points 6 1/2 ft., and 12 ft. 11 in. outboard from the centerline, the last-named being the tip attachment. Each wing, therefore, is composed of sections 6 1/2 ft., 6 ft. 5 in. and 2 ft. 8 in. long. No protective or de-icing devices are on or in wing leading edge.
b. Fowler type flaps are operated hydraulically as well as the engine cowl flaps. A hand hydraulic pump is incorporated in the system as well as the engine-driven pump.
c. Cockpit is high-set over wing, with little streamlining.
d. Wheels retract hydraulically inward into wheel wells that form bulges in the wing leading edge at the fuselage.
e. Fuel tanks show evidence of attempts at self-sealing (probably similar to OSCAR, TONY and LILY). It is ineffective against U.S. .50 cal. fire. The tanks were covered with inflammable wool felt insulation. Two tanks are in each wing root, one of which measured 8 x 26 x 35 inches, which would give a capacity of about 27 1/2 U.S. gals. From the way one aircraft burned, a large fuel tank might also have been located in the fuselage.
f. Vulnerability. A short burst of .50 cal. ammunition fired into the left wing root caused one aircraft to start burning and crash. No armor plate was fitted.
g. Ammunition used was:
(1) Armor-piercing tracer–green and white band.
(2) Explosive–white band.
(3) Incendiary (new type)–dark purple band.
a. Believed to contain thermite.
(4) Two types of loading were used in groups of about twenty rounds each.
a. Group I: 1 explosive, 2 armor-piercing tracer.
b. Group II: 1 explosive, 1 armor-piercing tracer, 1 incendiary.h. A small inclosed running light is placed in each wing tip.
i. Power Plant. Although some details of the Nakajima 1450 h.p. twin-row air-cooled radial engine are contained in the previous Summaries, a consolidated report of all the details is given below.
a. Description: Conventional, compact design, 14 cylinder, twin-row, air-cooled, radial engine, incorporating a two speed mechanical type blower, hydromatic constant speed and variable pitch propeller control gearing, front and rear cam plates used for front and rear cylinder valves respectively.b. Specifications:
Cylinder bore . . . . . 5.75 in. Piston Stroke . . . . . 6.30″. Displacement . . . . . 2290 Cu. in. Reduction gear ratio . . . . . 11:16 Supercharger: . . . . . 8.64:1 Low ratio . . . . . 7.20:1 Impeller is 22 blade, diameter 12 inches, height 3 inches. Overall diameter . . . . . 48 in.
c. Pistons: Light alloy, forged and machined. Square “honey-comb” ribbing cast underneath the head and finning inside the skirt. Half-moon cutouts in piston skirt below the piston pin to allow counter weight clearance. Three compression rings and two oil rings in one groove above piston pin. One ring in groove on piston skirt. Piston weight 1.910 kg. (4.3 lbs).
d. Piston pins: Full floating type.
e. Cylinders: Steel barrel, alloy head, screwed and shrunk on. One inlet and one exhaust valve per cylinder. Two spark plugs per cylinder. Three valve springs per valve. Valves retained by split-collets. Noticeably deep finning on both barrel and head. Bore 5.75 inches.
f. Valves: Tulip-type intake valve, chrome plated. Mushroom type exhaust valve.
g. Cam gears: Double three lobe track for each row of cylinders, the front row being served by one located in front” of the engine, the rear row served by a cam behind the crankcase proper.
h. Master rod: One piece construction.
i. Reduction gears: Epicyclic spur type (Wright Pattern)
Number of teeth of Annulus gear . . . . . 66 Number of teeth on Sun gear . . . . . 30 Six planer gears with 18 teeth each Reduction ratio . . . . . 11:16
j. Thrust bearing: (Propeller) Ball thrust type.
k. Main bearing: All roller type bearings.
l. Crankcase: Conventional design, blower section, power section and nose section. Alloy, bolted together.
m. Propeller hub: Standard Hamilton v.p., c.s. type.
n. Constant speed gear: Driven from front cam ring.
o. Carburetor: Three-barrel, down-draft, low-pressure type with three cork floats.
p. General: Quality, workmanship and finish are comparable with U.S. standards. The basic design shows strong influence from Pratt Whitney with some adaptations from the Wright designs. Sound, logical engineering advancements have been made by the Japanese engineers and the fact that the cutouts in the piston make possible a longer stroke with this diameter engine is worthy of note. As no radical changes in design from previous Japanese models have been made it is felt that this engine should have dependable performance.
-
Tags
- 1/35th
- aircraft
- antiaircraft
- antitank
- armor
- artillery
- B-17
- bomber
- book
- crew
- dragon
- fighter
- figures
- flak
- german
- gun
- hobby
- intelligence reports
- italy
- japanese
- jeep
- Luftwaffe
- miniart
- miscellaneous
- model
- navy
- ordnance
- panzer
- photos
- pilot
- poster
- publications
- recognition
- research
- resin
- scale models
- sherman
- tank
- tiger
- training
- truck
- tunisia
- vehicles
- video
- weapons
Categories
-
Recent Posts
- B-17 Ditching Mockup for Training
- In the Hedgerows of Normandy…
- Destroyed Rhine Bridges
- “Major” – The Parachuting St. Bernard
- PWs at Verdun
- Raft Survival of a P-51 Pilot
- Meet the Dragon Wagon
- Metz, France (1944-1945)
- Continental Red Seal Engines
- M10 Tank Destroyers on Railcar
- Captured Tiger Tank Photo Op
- Photo Set, Unknown Unit in Germany
-
Popular Posts
- Erkennungsmarke (German Dog Tag) From Handbook on German Army Identification, U.S. Milit... posted on October 11, 2010 | under dog tag , erkennungsmarke , german , miscellaneous , research , wehrmacht
- Italian Navy Uniforms and Insignia Italian Navy Uniforms and Insignia: CON... posted on October 8, 2010 | under insignia , italian navy , italy , newsmap , uniforms
- Valentine Tank Illustrations Front and side views of the Valentine Tank (officially... posted on October 21, 2012 | under armor , front view , illustrations , russian , side view , valentine
- Japanese Type 1 Ho-Ki Armored Personnel Carrier The Japanese produced a limited number of the innovativ... posted on September 7, 2010 | under apc , armor , ho-ki , intelligence reports , japanese , luzon , prime mover , tractor , type 1
- Early-War Uniform A private photograph from 1942 showing details of the e... posted on May 20, 2020 | under uniform
- 89th Infantry Division in Germany Photographs of the U.S. Army's 89th Infantry ... posted on May 21, 2020 | under 1945 , 89th infantry division , germany , gotha , ilmenau , waltershausen
- Bendix Chin Turret Bendix manual on the Operation and Maintenance of the B... posted on December 31, 2010 | under aircraft , bendix , chin turret , gun , turret , weapons
- German 105-mm Howitzer Three views of the German 105-mm howitzer (10.5 cm leFH... posted on November 23, 2011 | under 105mm , artillery , german , howitzer , leFH 18 , manual , technical manual , weapons
- How’s Your Sherman, Herman? M4 Sherman Tank modification and upgrades from Army Mot... posted on November 3, 2010 | under armor , army motors , m4 , maintenance , ordnance , research , sherman , tank , technical
Archives
- June 2020 (13)
- May 2020 (23)
- April 2020 (2)
- March 2020 (2)
- February 2020 (2)
- January 2020 (2)
- December 2019 (1)
- November 2019 (11)
- October 2019 (2)
- September 2019 (1)
- August 2019 (1)
- July 2019 (2)
- June 2019 (1)
- May 2019 (2)
- April 2019 (1)
- March 2019 (1)
- February 2019 (1)
- January 2019 (2)
- March 2015 (4)
- February 2015 (6)
- January 2015 (22)
- December 2014 (13)
- November 2014 (9)
- October 2014 (7)
- September 2014 (3)
- August 2014 (9)
- July 2014 (3)
- June 2014 (2)
- May 2014 (5)
- April 2014 (3)
- March 2014 (4)
- February 2014 (6)
- January 2014 (12)
- December 2013 (2)
- November 2013 (8)
- October 2013 (5)
- September 2013 (4)
- August 2013 (2)
- July 2013 (23)
- June 2013 (12)
- May 2013 (3)
- April 2013 (5)
- March 2013 (7)
- February 2013 (2)
- January 2013 (1)
- December 2012 (48)
- November 2012 (46)
- October 2012 (14)
- September 2012 (10)
- August 2012 (18)
- July 2012 (13)
- June 2012 (6)
- May 2012 (3)
- April 2012 (4)
- March 2012 (13)
- February 2012 (12)
- January 2012 (4)
- December 2011 (5)
- November 2011 (27)
- October 2011 (3)
- September 2011 (3)
- August 2011 (4)
- July 2011 (3)
- June 2011 (5)
- May 2011 (5)
- April 2011 (3)
- March 2011 (3)
- February 2011 (3)
- January 2011 (42)
- December 2010 (75)
- November 2010 (75)
- October 2010 (62)
- September 2010 (36)
- August 2010 (41)
- July 2010 (11)
- June 2010 (23)
- May 2010 (5)
- April 2010 (2)
- March 2010 (10)
- February 2010 (3)
- January 2010 (2)
- December 2009 (3)
- November 2009 (7)
- October 2009 (1)
- September 2009 (1)
- August 2009 (6)
- July 2009 (1)
Not a bad plane, but it had no chance against Allied fighters. Definitelly better than the Oscar.