German 105-mm Howitzer

Three views of the German 105-mm howitzer (10.5 cm leFH 18, leichte FeldHaubitze) from the U.S. War Department technical manual TM E9-325A: German 105-mm Howitzer Materiel, June 1944.

German 105-mm Howitzer and Carriage, Firing Position

German 105-mm Howitzer and Carriage, Firing Position

Continue reading

Posted in artillery, intelligence reports, miscellaneous, publications, weapons | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on German 105-mm Howitzer

When to Salute

The Navy version of “When to Salute” from Bureau of Naval Personnel Information Bulletin, January 1944.

When to Salute, U.S. Navy

Left to Right, Top to Bottom: ENLISTED MEN SALUTE OFFICERS AND JUNIOR OFFICERS SALUTE SENIOR WHEN MEETING, PASSING NEAR, WHEN ADDRESSING, OR BEING ADDRESSED; OFFICERS AND ALL ENLISTED MEN NOT IN FORMATION SALUTE DURING HONORS TO THE FLAG OR PLAYING OF NATIONAL ANTHEM; WHEN SEVERAL OFFICERS ARE SALUTED, ALL SHALL RETURN IT; WHEN OVERTAKING A SENIOR, THE SALUTE SHALL DE GIVEN WHEN ABREAST, WITH “BY YOUR LEAVE, SIR”; WHEN REPORTING (covered); GUARDS SALUTE ALL OFFICERS PASSING CLOSE ABOARD; ON EVERY OCCASION SALUTE THE CAPTAIN, OFFICERS SENIOR TO HIM, SENIOR OFFICERS FROM OTHER SHIPS; MEN AND OFFICERS SALUTE ALL SENIOR U.S. AND ALLIED OFFICERS THEY MAY ENCOUNTER; ENLISTED MEN RISE AND SALUTE WHEN AN OFFICER ENTERS OR LEAVES; RENDER SALUTES DUE THEM TO ALL OFFICERS IN VEHICLES (IF SAFETY PERMITS); ON FIRST DAILY MEETING, ENLISTED MEN SALUTE ALL OFFICERS, JUNIOR OFFICERS SALUTE SENIOR; WHEN OFFICER MEETS DETAIL ASHORE OR AFLOAT, MAN IN CHARGE SALUTES FOR DETAIL; OFFICERS RISE AND SALUTE WHEN A SENIOR ENTERS OR LEAVES; PASSENGERS IN CARS RENDER AND RETURN SALUTE (DRIVER: NO, IF SAFETY IS INVOLVED); SENTRIES AT GANGWAYS SALUTE ALL OFFICES GOING OR COMING OVER SIDE, PASSING CLOSE ABOARD; UPON APPROACH OF OFFICER, ONE CALLS ATTENTION, ALL SALUTE; WHEN OFFICER PASSES NEAR, OFFICER OR PETTY OFFICER IN CHARGE SALUTES, IF NONE PRESENT MEN DO; WHEN COLORS ARE SOUNDED, MAN IN CHARGE OF DETAIL SALUTES: OTHERS AT ATTENTION.
 

Posted in miscellaneous, navy, training | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Armor in the Middle East

The U.S. Military Intelligence Service issued the “Campaign Study” series during WWII to summarize lessons from the various campaigns. Written by U.S. observers in the Middle East, Notes and Lessons on Operations in the Middle East (Campaign Study, No. 5, January 1943) drew a number of conclusions about German and British armor operations in North Africa.

In order of importance, the desirable characteristics of armored vehicles are (1) firepower, (2) mobility and mechanical reliability, (3) armor.

The British infantry tank and the U.S. M4 have relatively the same armor. But the British tank with its 2-pounder (40-mm) armament is undergunned; also, it possesses low tactical mobility and is mechanically unreliable. The M4, with its 75-mm high muzzle-velocity gun is effective against German tanks, possesses high tactical mobility, and is mechanically reliable. The M4 is a superior tank; the British infantry tank, because it lacks the first two characteristics, is almost worthless except for a few special operations.

Only after adequate firepower has been provided, and a high degree of mobility, accompanied by mechanical reliability, has been developed, is heavy armor plate for vehicles justifiable. When the first two characteristics are attained, such armor as does not interfere with mobility and reliability should be placed on the vehicle.

Armor is far less important than is generally supposed. Two years’ observation has indicated that if the tank compartment is penetrated, escape of the crew is usually impossible. Even though the tank does not burn, the German shell bursts after penetration, and the explosion destroys the crew. If the tank catches fire–and this is frequently the case–escape of the crew is impossible.

On the other hand, the same field observation indicates that chances of survival in an unarmored vehicle are almost as good as in an armored one, since the moment an unarmored vehicle is attacked the crew can abandon it. The same order of importance applies even more strongly to self-propelled artillery, where light armor is desirable but not essential.

In the race between armor and guns, guns are in the ascendancy.

In 1939 and 1940, German Panzer units overran Poland and Europe; the Allies’ antitank guns could not stop a tank. In 1940, General O’Connor’s infantry tanks were impervious to Italian artillery and antitank weapons. During the past 2 years, however, in the desert and elsewhere, there has been a steady increase in the power of antitank weapons. Today both the British and the Germans have weapons which will stop any tank.

This increase in the effectiveness of antitank guns has caused the tank to become a weapon of opportunity, to be used only against objectives which it can easily and quickly destroy. In such a role the tank is becoming more and more dependent on other weapons.

 

Posted in armor, miscellaneous, research | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Armor in the Middle East

II Corps Lessons Learned

The commander of II Corps published the following comments concerning the combat lessons learned during the advance from the Garigliano River to Rome in Italy in 1943-1944:

HEADQUARTERS II CORPS

In the Field
16 June 1944

Subject: Lessons Learned.
To: Divisions and Separate Unit Commanders, II Corps.

1. A detailed analysis of lessons learned during the II Corps advance from the GARIGLIANO to ROME is being made. This study will be published at an early date. Rather than wait for the publication of the detailed compilation, I wish to give you my comments now so they can be acted upon during the present training period.

a. Towns must be taken from deep flank and rear.

b. The usual practice of battering towns with air and artillery serves little purpose and is extremely wasteful of ammunition and time.

c. The delay caused as by small enemy detachments is out of all proportion to the numbers and means at our disposal. Among other errors committed is our failure to leave roads soon enough and to make a wide enough envelopment or by-pass.

d. The combined use of armored and infantry units has been too cautious. The over-emphasis placed on fire power of tanks during the period when weather and terrain conditions prevented full use of armor has not been overcome and mobility has not been restored to its proper importance in the employment of tanks. Too often a column of tanks has remained inactive on a road, held up by a single SP or AT gun. The time lost waiting for infantry to arrive, deploy and attack the gun could have been reduced 50% or more by a rapid deployment and movement of the tanks or by a wide envelopment which would in most cases have resulted in the capture or destruction of the gun. Likewise, relatively large groups of infantry have been long delayed by a small enemy group with a machine gun or two astride a rod. Again, the time wasted waiting for the arrival and action of tanks could have been materially reduced by early and wide deployment.

e. Not enough use has been made of Air OP’s for reconnaissance purposes. Inasmuch as artillery targets have been relatively few during this pursuit phase, there should have been constant Cub air reconnaissance available to all leading elements.

f. In the long run, speed was made over the high ground, not over the roads or flat lands.

g. Too often commanders of all echelons waited for orders. The rapid advance made the maintenance of communications difficult and resulted in instructions being issued and received based on out of date information. Under such conditions commanders must act on their own responsibility, initiative and judgment. Inactivity is inexcusable.

2. We must be prepared mentally and tactically for a change in the character of combat when we next go into the line for we may encounter strong and bitter resistance. At some date or place the German may seek to make a stand but our constant pressure should greatly hamper him from getting set. The main bodies following our mobile advance detachments must be kept so in hand that they can be employed rapidly in accordance with simple and prepared plans.

3. Speed, not haste, is still the great factor.

GEOFFREY KEYES
Major General, U.S.A., Commanding.

 

Posted in combat reports, miscellaneous, publications, research, training | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Signals Intelligence in Operation Torch

The following report on Allied signal intelligence during Operation Torch and the campaign in North Africa is reproduced from “Intelligence Lessons from North Africa, Operation Torch” by the Office of Assistant Chief of Staff, G-2, Allied Force Headquarters, March 1943.

C. SIGNALS INTELLIGENCE (Y).

20. Any review of the lessons learnt in this campaign in the functioning of Signals Intelligence (British: Wireless Intelligence, generally known as Y) can be divided into three parts:

a. Before landing,
b. After landing and
c. General.

It is proposed to consider the subject under these three heads.

21. Before Landing.

The outstanding lesson learnt was the need for dispatching complete units in the first follow up and not dividing them into roughly two halves between convoys 2 .and 3. This precaution had been taken to avoid the risk of the total loss of the unit, but it is now seen that by dividing the unit or units among several ships of the same convoy the same insurance against total loss is achieved. The advantages are that in the early stages of any campaign the maximum amount of Y cover is necessary as no other day to day source of intelligence exists, and also that the enemy being less security minded when his plans are interfered with, more is given away, all of which may be of exceeding value as the campaign develops. Considerable pressure would have to be exercised on the branch responsible for loading tables, but the advantages of a complete Y unit to the formation commander are such that the highest priority for its inclusion entire should be obtainable.

22. After Landing.

a. Assignment.

As 5 Corps did not land in the first follow up, the Corps Y unit (B-type Section) was attached to 78 Div H.Q. This arrangement worked extremely well, and the smallness of the Div I Staff was compensated by one of the I.O.’s of the Section estimating the value of Y intelligence in terms of I(a). Whenever the same problem arises, it is recommended that the Corps B-type Section be attached to the senior Division acting in quasi Corps role until such time as Corps H.Q. have landed. This is preferable to keeping the unit back until Corps H.Q. have landed partly for the reasons mentioned in para. 21 and partly because no Y unit can produce intelligence the moment it sets up house. This is due to the necessity for sorting the traffic heard (since all major wireless bands are full of’ traffic, much of which can be, heard even when the transmitter is many hundreds of miles away). The two mobile D/F trucks now part of every B-type Section have a considerable part to play in this preliminary sorting process.

b. B-type Section (1942).

The revised B-type Section (1942) is an undoubted improvement on the 1941 edition. This has only been partly evident so far, as the Section with 5 Corps is on the old establishment as regards personnel and transport but on the new one as regards equipment. Had the Section been completely on the new establishment it would undoubtedly have produced more; if not better, results. The strain on too few operators coping with increased sets has resulted in a certain amount of: sickness-due to overkeenness on their part.

c. Communications.

The need for adequate communications facilities between all Sections of the Y Service cannot sufficiently be stressed. Y must be provided with its own W/T communications as quite apart from the need for passing intelligence (in high grade cypher) it cannot function properly unless technical information is continually passing between all its units and I(s) at higher levels. The normal Signals channels can sometimes cope with the intelligence side, rarely with the technical information which is often required in the form of “question and answer”.

A further point is that communication should be authorized from the start with G.H.Q. of adjacent theater or theaters. Owing to special cyphers for Y intelligence issued to this H.Q. not being made available to G.H.Q. Middle East, much valuable assistance from Mideast in the early stages could not be received.

d. Siting of Units.

The siting of Y units provided many difficulties owing to the mountainous nature of the ground. Not until recently has a general move forward of higher formations taken place so that the problem has constantly been where to site units so that they fulfill their two main functions

(1) of taking the traffic required.

(2) of passing it in shortest time to the Intelligence Branch of the formation to which assigned.

The only general answer possible is that units may have to be sited near a lower formation than is customary, reporting over their own links to the higher formation to which they belong. (The alternative of a Signal Center does not work well in practice as the lines are usually overloaded no matter what priority is assigned to Y units.)

23. General.

The following points of a more general application are grouped together for convenience though not necessarily inter-related.

a. Inclusion of ‘veterans’.

An immense advantage would accrue in any future operation by the inclusion of personnel from units with battle experience on the strength of new units first coming out. Experience counts more in Y work than is generally realized. A judicious interlarding with Mideast personnel in units fresh from home would have been of great value in this operation.

b. I a Training for I.O.’s.

Y I.O.’s trained in U.K. need to be more Ia minded. A detailed Order of Battle knowledge is an invaluable asset to any I.O. and more stress on this might be laid. It is also necessary for the Y I.O. to know what is, and is not, important to Ia so that his choice of information to pass back immediately may be right. So much of the intelligence produced by Y is ‘scrappy’ (due to difficulties of reception, new or only partially broken codes and the like) that the selection of the right ‘straw’ to indicate the wind is not always apparent. It is recommended therefore: that all I.O.’s in Y should at some period — preferably after being Y trained — serve an attachment of some weeks duration at Ia of a formation, preferably Corps or Division.

c. Intelligence School.

Soon after the start of any operation such as this provision should be made at G.H.Q. for a small “Intelligence School” to read all logs from Y units in the theater, to produce wireless network diagrams from them to check callsigns serial and row changes and generally to be responsible for the longer term W/T I. Sections in the field have little opportunity for more then short term W/T I and in times of battle practically none at all. Investigation into map reference systems, code systems, and the like cannot be undertaken locally but must be done centrally. This is a very real need and should be catered for in any future operation. This party should normally arrive simultaneously with the Army A-type Section.

d. Pool of Reinforcements.

An adequate pool of reinforcements should be drawn up and included in all future operations. In this theater only two W/T I Other Ranks were provided and were absorbed soon after landing leaving no reinforcements whatsoever. On the Signals side the scale is also too low and requires reconsideration. Any loss of personnel through enemy action or sickness is immediately reflected in the operational output of the unit. The ideal solution would be the dispatch of one complete B-type Section over and above those assigned to Corps. This unit could then relieve Corps Sections in rotation either in whole or in part and provide all grades of reinforcements as required.

e. American Y Units.

All the above remarks have been confined to British units as the participation of complete American units in this theater has not yet materialized. The American Section with British W/T I personnel has acquitted itself well in spite of many handicaps due to faults inherent in the general organization of American field Y units. This subject is one however which needs to be investigated at a higher level and a joint American-British Committee might well at some later stage be charged with examining the problem in the light of British experience and American difficulties.

24. Conclusion.

In the main the plans made, the training of the units and the results achieved have been entirely satisfactory. The improvements suggested above are chiefly concerned with detail and should without undue difficulty be capable of realization.

25. I.S. Staff at Army H.Q.

It is considered that only one I(s) Staff Officer is needed at Army H.Q. until the arrival of the A-type Section.

26. Water Trailer for A-type Special Wireless Section.

A-type Special Wireless Section has a strength of 54 all ranks and only sixteen 2-gallon containers to hold drinking water. For technical reasons, the section is often sited in remote areas where the problem of obtaining drinking water is great.

It is considered that a water trailer is essential for the section.

 

Posted in miscellaneous, publications, research, training | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Alpine Miniatures October Releases

New October 1/35th and 1/16th WWII Russian and German figure releases from Alpine Miniatures.

 

Alpine Miniatures October Figure Releases   35127: 1/35th WWII Russian Scout #1
Sculpted by Alexander Zelenkov / Boxart Painted by Calvin Tan 

35128: 1/35th WWII Russian Scout #2
Sculpted by Alexander Zelenkov / Boxart Painted by Calvin Tan

35129: 1/35th WWII Russian Scout Set (2 figures)
Sculpted by Alexander Zelenkov/ Boxart Painted by Calvin Tan

16014: 1/16th Werner Mälders Luftwaffe Ace
Sculpted by Mike Good / Boxart Painted by Ernesto Reyes

 
 

Posted in news, scale models | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Alpine Miniatures October Releases

Jeep Tows a Glider

A jeep provides a tow for a U.S. Marine glider at Page Field, Parris Island, S.C. in May 1942. (Library of Congress, fsac.1a35111.)

Jeep Tows Glider at Parris Island
 

Posted in aircraft | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Jeep Tows a Glider

Demolition of the 155-mm gun M2

Instruction for demolition of the 155-mm gun M2 from the WWII U.S. War Department Technical Manual TM 9-350: 155-mm Gun M2; Carriage M1 and M1A1, Gun Mount M13; Heavy Carriage Limber M2 and M5; and Firing Platform M1, May 1945.

DEMOLITION TO PREVENT ENEMY USE

34. GENERAL.

a. The destruction of the materiel, subject to capture or abandonment in the combat zone, will be undertaken by the using arm only on authority delegated by the division or higher commander as a command function when such action is deemed necessary as a final resort to keep the materiel from reaching enemy hands.

b. Adequate destruction of artillery materiel means damaging it in such a way that the enemy cannot restore it to usable condition in the combat zone either by repair or by cannibalization. Adequate destruction requires that:

(1) Enough parts essential to the operation of the materiel must be damaged.

(2) Parts must be damaged beyond repair in the combat zone.

(3) The same parts must be destroyed on all materiel, so that the enemy cannot make up one operating unit by assembling parts from several partly destroyed units.

c. The tube and breech are the most vital parts of any piece of artillery. These are the first things to damage. After the tube and breech in importance come the recoil mechanism, sighting and fire control equipment, carriage, tires, gun book, and firing tables.

35. METHODS.

a. General.

(1) The destruction procedures outlined are arranged in order of effectiveness. Destruction should be accomplished by method No. 1, if possible. If method No. 1 cannot be used, destruction should be accomplished by one of the other methods outlined, in the priority shown.

(2) Whichever method is used, the sequence outlined must be followed. Uniformity of destruction will then be obtained, whether or not the method is carried to completion.

(3) Certain of the methods outlined require special tools and materials, such as nitrostarch and incendiary grenades, which may not be items of issue normally. The issue of such special tools and material, the vehicles for which issued, and the conditions under which destruction will be effected are command decisions in each case, according to the tactical situation.

(4) SIGHTS. Detach all optical sights. If evacuation is possible, carry the sights; if evacuation is not possible, thoroughly smash the sights.

b. Method No. 1 — destruction of tube, breech, and recoil mechanism.

(1) Open drain plug on recoil mechanism, allowing recoil fluid to drain. It is not necessary to wait for the recoil fluid to drain completely before firing the cannon in step (4), below.

(2) Place an armed (safety pin removed) antitank grenade M9A1, HE, or armed (safety pin removed) antitank rocket M6 in the tube with the nose end toward the rear. The grenade or rocket must be centered in the tube, using a wooden adapter. An alternate for the wooden adapter is the use of waste.

(3) Insert an unfuzed HE complete round or HE shell with propelling charge into the cannon and close the breech. Base-detonating HE shell cannot be used in this method.

(4) Fire the cannon, using a lanyard at least 100 feet long. The person firing should be under cover to the rear of the piece and approximately 20 degrees off the line of fire. Elapsed time: Approximately 2 to 3 minutes.

(5) The danger zone is approximately 500 yards.

c. Method No. 2.

(1) Insert TNT blocks in the bore, near the muzzle and in the chamber of the cannon. Close the breechblock as far as possible without damaging the safety fuse. Plug the muzzle tightly with earth to a distance of approximately 3 calibers from muzzle. Detonate the TNT charges simultaneously. Thirty to fifty half-pound blocks will be needed for effective demolition. If it is not possible to plug the bore, a larger number of TNT blocks will be needed for effective demolition.

(2) Ram an HE shell (without base fuze) into the forcing cone and place TNT blocks behind it, as specified above. Close the breechblock and detonate the TNT charge. A sufficient length of safety fuse should be used to permit personnel to reach safety zone or cover. The fuse may be routed through the primer hole in the spindle.

(3) Attention is invited to the fact that, for the larger calibers, the number of blocks to be used is an estimate not proved by tests.

d. Method No. 3.

(1) Place unfuzed incendiary grenades M14, on their sides, one on top of another, in the chamber. Close the breech. Equip another incendiary grenade with a 15-second safety fuse, ignite, and toss it in the muzzle. Quickly elevate the cannon to its maximum elevation. Elapsed time: 3 to 5 minutes. Six to eight grenades per cannon are required.

(2) The metal from the grenades will fuse with the interior of the breechblock, making it impossible to open the breech.

e. Method No. 4.

(1) Fire adjacent guns at each other at point-blank range, using HE or AP shells. Two or more direct hits from a weapon of the same caliber, on a vital spot such as the breech mechanism, recoil mechanism, or tube should adequately destroy the artillery piece. Fire from cover. Danger space is from 200 to 250 yards.

(2) Destroy the last gun and carriage by the best means available.

(3) Danger from cannibalization is inherent in this method.

f. Ammunition. Instructions for demolition of ammunition are contained in TM 9-1901.

Posted in artillery, training, weapons | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Demolition of the 155-mm gun M2

LST Off Cape Gloucester

LST

An LST, crammed with men and material for the invasion of Cape Gloucester, New Britain, nears the Japanese-held shore. For a suggestion of the complexity of the Navy’s amphibious operations, see how many different articles you can identify on the deck. (Official U.S. Coast Guard Photograph.)

Source: Bureau of Naval Personnel Information Bulletin, February 1944.

 

Posted in miscellaneous, navy, photos | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on LST Off Cape Gloucester

New Ace 1/72nd Kits

Two recent 1/72nd scale announcements by ACE Models covering the WWII era:

Medium Personnel Carrier Kfz. 16 Wehrmacht   Kit #72259: Kfz. 16 Uniform Chassis Medium Personnel Carrier / Signals Car
Leichter Schutzenpanzerwagen Sdkfz. 250/1 Neu   Kit #72275: Sd.Kfz. 250/1 (neu) Leichter Schutzenpanzerwagen (le SPW)

Posted in scale models | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on New Ace 1/72nd Kits